Value-semantic orientations of the personality of the potential scientific and engineering elite
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/1996-5648-2023-4-586-597Keywords:
values, personality, scientific and engineering elite, psychological research, eliteAbstract
The article investigates the value-semantic orientations of an individual in the potential scientific-engineering elite. The authors set themselves a task in the study of value-meaning orientations of the personality of future nuclear engineers, biotechnologists and programmers in the field of economics. To achieve this goal, value orientations and meaning constructs were analyzed among representatives of the scientific and engineering elite. The results of the study can be useful for understanding the motivational factors influencing the development of scientific and engineering elite, as well as for developing effective approaches to motivate and support this group of people in their career growth and achievement of high results.References
Карабущенко Н. Б., Нерсесянц А. В., Штырев М. М. Ценностно-смысловые ориентации молодежного социально-ориентированного лидерства // Человеческий фактор: Социальный психолог. 2021. №. 1. С. 59-71.
Карабущенко Н. Б., Пилишвили Т. С., Стево З. Сравнительный анализ ценностей и этнической идентичности сербских студентов-билингвов и монолингвов // Педагогика и психология образования. 2016. №. 4. С. 95-101.
Inglehart R. Values, objective needs, and subjective satisfaction among western publics // Comparative Political Studies. 1977. Vol. 9(4). P. 429-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407700900403
Schwartz S. A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and // Comparative sociology. 2006. Vol. 5(2). P. 137-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357
Hofstede G. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations // Collegiate Aviation Re-view. 2016. Vol. 34(2). P. 108.
Inglehart R., Welzel C. Modernization, cultural change, and de-mocracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2005. P. 333.
Values in a cross-cultural triangle: A comparison of value taxonomies in the Netherlands, Austria, and Spain / De Raad B. [et al] // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2016. Vol. 47(8). P. 1053-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116659698
De Raad B., Van Oudenhoven J. P. Factors of values in the Dutch language and their relationship to factors of personality // European Journal of Personality. 2008. Vol. 22(2). P. 81-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.667
Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries / Schwartz S. H. // Advances in experimental social psychology. 1992. Vol. 25 P. 1-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Artistic Labor Markets: Contingent Work, Excess Supply and Occupational Risk Management. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture / Ginsburgh Throsby D. [et al]. Amsterdam, North Holland, 2006. Vol. 1. Р. 679.
Rokeach M. The nature of human values. Free press, 1973. Р. 438.
Beugelsdijk S., Welzel C. Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart // Journal of cross-cultural psychology. 2018. Vol. 49. P. 1469-1505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118798505
Gouveia V. V., Milfont T. L., Guerra V. M. Functional theory of human values: Testing its content and structure hypotheses /// Personality and individual differences. 2014. Vol. 60. P. 41-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.012
Maslow A. H. A Theory Of Human Motivation // Psychological Review. 1943. Vol. 50. P. 370-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Vernon P. E., Allport G. W. A test for personal values // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1931. Vol. 3. P. 231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073233
Maio G. R. Mental representations of social values // Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, 2010. Vol. 42. P. 1-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42001-8
Hofstede G. Culture and organizations // International studies of management & organization. 1980. Vol. 10(4). P. 15-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
Koller S. H. Vulnerable Children and Youth: The Psychology of Social Development Innovative Approaches // Psychology in Brazil: Scientists Making a Difference. 2019. P. 117-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11336-0_8
Milfont T. L., Milojev P., Sibley C. G Values stability and change in adulthood: A 3-year longitudinal study of rank-order stability and mean-level differences // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2016. Vol. 42(5). P. 572-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216639245
Integrating content and structure aspects of the self: Traits, values, and self-improvement / S. Roccas [et al] // Journal of personality. 2014. Vol. 82(2). P. 144-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12041
Sagiv L., Roccas S. How do values affect behavior? Let me count the ways // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2021. Vol. 25(4). P. 295-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211015975
Verplanken B., Holland R. W. Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2002. Vol. 82(3). P. 434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434
