The issue of generating the leader's home policy losses by the representatives of different social groups: in search for theoretical foundations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2016-1-32-40Keywords:
political decision-making, acceptable decision, public opinion, foreign policy, democracy, authoritarianism, home policy losses, audience costsAbstract
One of the aspects of the functioning of public opinion in the sphere of foreign policy deals with the participation of different social groups in generation of home policy losses, which the political leader may encounter as a result of the absence of support for his foreign policy course. In the article the problem is considered from the point of view of political approach to decision-making by B. Farnham, the poliheuristic theory by A. Mintz, the concept of audience cost by J. Fearon, and empirical research of interaction of public opinion and the power in the domain of political decision-making. It is argued that the nature of the political decisions, presupposing the continuous interaction of professional politicians and the public, creates conditions for the generation of losses by the representatives of the different social groups. The most ample opportunities for this situation are connected with the functioning of democratic institutions, and decision-making about «important» issues, about which social groups formulate its opinions and demonstrate the readiness to transform its public opinion to the political demands.References
Киселев И. Ю., Смирнова А. Г., Храброва К. Г. Неудачи во внешней политике: когда лидер теряет внутриполитическую поддержку? // Социальные и гуманитарные знания. 2015. Том 1. №3. С. 190-198.
Киселев И. Ю., Смирнова А. Г., Храброва К. Г. Последствия внешнеполитического курса как фактор внутриполитических потерь лидера // Власть. 2015. № 10. С. 42-49.
Fearon J. D. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes // American Political Science Review. 1994. Vol. 88. N 3. Pp. 577-592.
Mintz A. Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Poliheuristic Perspective // Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making / Ed. by A. Mintz. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. Pp. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07848-3_1
Соловьев А. И. Политология: политическая теория, политические технологии. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. C. 485.
Лысцов В. В. Теория процессов принятия политических решений: Дисс.. канд. пол. наук. М., 2004. C. 18-21.
Hilsman R. To Move a Nation: the Politics of Foreign Policy in the Administration of John F. Kennedy. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1967. P. 78.
Fearon J. D. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes // American Political Science Review. 1994. Vol. 88. N 3. P. 577.
Fearon J. D. Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes // American Political Science Review. 1994. Vol. 88. N 3. P. 581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944796
Farnham B. Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis: A Study of Political Decision Making. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997. 313 p.
Mintz A. Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making: A Poliheuristic Perspective // Integrating Cognitive and Rational Theories of Foreign Policy Decision Making / Ed. by A. Mintz. NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. P. 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07848-3
Potter P. B. K., Baum M. A. Looking for Audience Costs in all the Wrong Places: Electoral Institutions, Media Access, and Democratic Constraint // The Journal of Politics, 2013, pp. 1-15. URL: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/mbaum/documents/JOP_AudienceCosts.pdf
Hildebrand K. A. The Effects of Audience Costs on the Efficacy of United States Threats toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea from 1992-2003. A paper presented at the ISA Conference in Montreal Quebec. March 2011. URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/5/0/2/4/6/p502468_index.html?phpsessid=701bdef5c23df45c6392e0bbcf7acc60
Levy J. S. The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace // Annual Review of Political Science, 1998. N 1. Pp. 139-165.
Hildebrand K. A. The Effects of Audience Costs on the Efficacy of United States Threats toward the Democratic People's Republic of Korea from 1992-2003. A paper presented at the ISA Conference in Montreal Quebec. March 2011. URL: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/5/0/2/4/6/p502468_index.html?phpsessid=701bdef5c23df45c6392e0bbcf7acc60
Potter P. B. K., Baum M. A. Looking for Audience Costs in all the Wrong Places: Electoral Institutions, Media Access, and Democratic Constraint // The Journal of Politics, 2013, pp. 1-15. URL: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/mbaum/documents/JOP_AudienceCosts.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001230
Weeks J. L. Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict // American Political Science Review, 2012. Vol. 106, N 2. P. 343.
Levy J. S. The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace // Annual Review of Political Science, 1998. N 1. P. 153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.139
Shapiro R. Y., Jacobs L. R. Public Opinion, Foreign Policy, and Democracy: How Presidents Use Public Opinion // Navigating Public Opinion. Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy / Ed. by J. Manza, F.L. Cook, B.I. Page. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Pp. 184-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195149333.003.0011
Page B. I., Shapiro R. Y. Effect of Public Opinion on Policy // American Political Science Review, 1983. N 77. Pp. 175-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1956018
Monroe A. Public opinion and public policy 1980-1993 // Public Opinion Quarterly, 1998. N 62. Pp. 6-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/297828
Manza J., Cook F. L., Page B. I. Navigating Public Opinion: Introduction // Navigating Public Opinion. Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy / Ed. by J. Manza, F. L. Cook, B. I. Page. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. P. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195149333.001.0001
Wlezien C., Soroka S. N. The Relationship between Public Opinion and Policy // Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior / ed. by R. Dalton, H-D. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 803.
Holsti O. R. American Public Opinion and Foreign Policy after September 11: The Iraq War // Public Participation in Foreign Policy / Ed. By J. Headley, A. Reitzig, J. Burt. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. P. 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367180_3
Лапин Н. И. Ценности, группы интересов и трансформация российского общества // Социологические исследования. 1997. № 3. C. 16.
Лапин Н. И. Ценности, группы интересов и трансформация российского общества // Социологические исследования. 1997. № 3. C. 16-17.
Morgenthau H. J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. NY: Alfred Knopf, 1973. P. 147.
Федоров В. В. Общественное мнение и политические решения. Заметки на полях «русской весны» // Мониторинг общественного мнения. 2014. №5 (123). С. 8.
Wlezien C., Soroka S. N. The Relationship between Public Opinion and Policy // Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior / Ed. by R. Dalton, H-D. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 808.
Geddes B. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. 314 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11910
Weeks J. L. Strongmen and Straw Men: Authoritarian Regimes and the Initiation of International Conflict // American Political Science Review, 2012. Vol. 106, N 2. P. 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000111
Соловьев А. И. Политология: политическая теория, политические технологии. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2000. C. 483.
Farnham B. Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis: A Study of Political Decision Making. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997. 313 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691227511
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Socialʹnye i gumanitarnye znania

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
