Formation of participation culture of citizens in housing self-government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2019-2-136-145Keywords:
housing and communal services, capital repair of apartment buildings, culture of housing self-government, cognitive component of culture of housing self-government, motivation component of culture of housing self-government, behavior component of culture of housing self-governmentAbstract
In the article the issues of the formation of culture of housing self-government among citizens are under consideration, using as an example the participation of the homeowners in the creation of the common good- capital repair of apartment houses. In order to study the citizens’ involvement in the participation in the system of housing self-government, the sociological data, collected by means of survey of tenants from the apartment buildings’, that were included in the regional program of capital repair, were analyzed (N = 600). For the detailed description of the culture of citizens’ participation in the process of housing self-government its three components were singled out and examined: the cognitive, motivation and behavior components. In the course of the conducted sociological research there was established that the inhabitants of Yaroslavl have grounds for active participation in housing self-government. However, on the basis of the performed analysis the conclusion was made that for the majority of the tenants of housing apartments the attitude to participation in housing self-government, as far as capital repair of their communal property concerns, is not a characteristic feature. For the formation of the culture of citizens’ participation in housing self-government the recommendations, are presented. Besides, a significant role of the homeowners’ association in dealing with the issues of decision-making by the proprietors about communal property of housing apartments, where they live, is paid a particular attention.References
Сидоренко А. Д., Чефранова Е. А. Жилищная культура и формирование эффективного пользователя // Жилищное право. 2006. № 1. С. 27-32.
Валиев Ш. З., Гавриленко И. Г., Седаков Д. А. Жилищное самоуправление граждан как фактор повышения качества жилищно-коммунальных услуг // Вестник УГНТУ. Наука, образование, экономика. Серия экономика. 2017. № 3. С. 20-25.
Услуги ЖКХ: оценки пользователей // ВЦИОМ. Пресс-выпуск 3005. 22.12.2015: сайт. [2015]. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=210 (дата обращения: 11.05.2019)
Шомина Е. С. Наша дом, наша улица. Пермь: ОТ и ДО, 2011. 101 c.
По данным Государственной корпорации - Фонд содействия реформированию жилищно-коммунального хозяйства // Реформа ЖКХ: сайт. [2018]. URL: https://www.reformagkh.ru/analytics#overhaul-section (дата обращения: 11.05.2019)
Ряховская А. Н., Таги-Заде Ф. Г. Коммунальные услуги - общественное благо // Жилищное и коммунальное хозяйство. 2004. № 12. С. 3-6.
Комиссарова Л. А. Природа жилищно-коммунальных услуг как социально значимого общественного блага // Вестник НГИЭИ. 2014. № 11 (42). С. 55-62.
Хархордин О. В. Куда идет теория практик: поворот к материальности // Социологические исследования. 2012. № 11. С. 20-35.
Майерс Д. Социальная психология. СПб: Питер, 1997. 688 с.
Ostrom E. Analyzing collective action // International Association of Agricultural Economists. 2010. Vol. 41. № 1. P. 155-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
