Ontological turns in contemporary political science: in search for compliance with politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-2-122-133Keywords:
political science, crisis, interdisciplinary synthesis, unity of methodology and ontology, ontological turn, political, political reality, politicization of ontology, ontologization of politicsAbstract
The article reveals the content of the main trends in the development of contemporary political science in connection with crisis phenomena affecting its thematic, methodological and theoretical problems, as well as its connection with real political practice. The logic of the search for new political thinking consists in a sequential transition from solving the problems of the crisis in the field of interdisciplinary methodological synthesis to considering the unity of political methodology and ontology, and then to ontologizing political studies expressed in two ontological turns. Interdisciplinary synthesis involves overcoming the boundaries between qualitative and quantitative research, as well as the natural and social sciences. The unity of political methodology and ontology was based on the recognition of the primacy of substantive political research. The first ontological turn concerned criticism of the post-political review of politics and attempts to substantiate political theory and philosophy as a fact of politics. In the thematic plan, attention was paid to disclosing the content of the political and substantiating the relationship between philosophy and politics. The second ontological turn led to the politicization of ontology and the ontologization of politics by criticizing metaphysics, rationalism, and human subjectivity. This turn is expressed in the new political realism, which includes actor-network theory and object-oriented ontology.References
Гаман-Голутвина О. В. Преодолевая методологические различия: споры о познании политики в эпоху неопределенности // Политические исследования. Полис. 2019. № 5. С. 19-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.03
Jervis R. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997. 328 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822409
Political Complexity: Nonlinear Models of Politics / Ed. by D. Richards. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003. 349 p.
Complexity and Policy Analysis: Tools and Methods for Desining Robust Policies in a Complex World / Ed. by L. Dennard, K. Richardson, G. Morcol. Marblehead, MA: ISCE Publishing, 2008. 428 p.
Geyer R. Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to 21st Century Politics, Policy and Society. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2010. 224 p.
Elliot E. Complexity, Politics, and Public Policy // Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning and Complexity / Еd. by L. D. Kiel. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers, 2003. Р. 3-42.
Сморгунов Л. В. Сложность в политике: некоторые методологические направления исследований // Вестник С-Петерб. ун-та. Серия 6. 2012. Вып. 4. С. 90-101.
Munck G. The Past and Present of Comparative Politics // Munck G., Snyder R. (eds.). Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. P. 32-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801884634
Munck G., Snyder R. Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics // Comparative Political Studies. 2007. Vol. 40. № 1. P. 5-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294815
Mahoney J. Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics // Comparative Political Studies. 2007. Vol. 40. № 2. P. 122-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296345
Bennett A., Elman C. Qualitative Methods. The View From the Subfields // Comparative Political Studies. 2007. Vol. 40. № 2. P. 111-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296344
Collier D. Critical Junctures, Concepts, and Methods // Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics / Ed. by G. Munck, R. Snyder. Baltomore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. P. 556-600.
Rosenthal I. Ontology and political theory: A critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault // European Journal of Political Theory. 2019. Vol. 18. № 2. P. 238-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116659633
Williams J. Lyotard the Political. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2000. 153 p.
Kymlicka W. Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2002. 497 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198782742.003.0001
Mouffe Ch. On the Political (Thinking in Action). L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2005. 144 p.
Бадью А. Мета/Политика: Можно ли мыслить политику? Краткий трактат по метаполитике / Пер. с фр. Б. Скуратов, К. Голубович. М.: Логос, 2005. 240 с.
Латур Б. Политика природы. Как привить наукам демократию. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2018. 336 с.
Деланда М. Новая философия общества. Теория ассамбляжей и социальная сложность. Пер. с англ. К. С. Майоровой. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2018. 170 с.
Харман Г. Спекулятивный реализм: введение. М.: РИПОЛ классик, 2019. 496 с.
Брайант Л. Демократия объектов / Пер. с англ. О. С. Мышкина. Пермь: Гиле Пресс, 2019. 320 с.
Demeulenaere E. A Political Ontology of Seeds: The transformative Frictions of a farmers' movement in Europe // Focaal - Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology. 2014. № 69. P. 45-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2014.690104
Blaney D. L., Tickner A. B. Worlding, Ontological Politics and the Possibility of a Decolonial IR // Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2017. Vol. 45. № 3. P. 293-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817702446
Bormpoudakis D. Three implications of political ontology for the political ecology of conservation // Journal of Political Ecology. 2019. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 545-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v26i1.22014
Shaw I., Meehan K. Force-full: Power, Politics Object-oriented Philosophy // Area. 2013. Vol. 45. № 2. P. 216-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12023
Juronen M., Häkli J. Politicizing ontology // Progress in Human Geography. 2017. Vol. 41. № 5. P. 561-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516652953
Latour B. Turning around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries' Paper // Social Studies of Science. 2007. Vol. 37. № 5. P. 811-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707081222
Мейясу К. После конечности. Эссе о необходимости контингентности. Екатеринбург, М.: Кабинетный ученый, 2015. 196 с.
Chandler D. Digital Governance in the Anthropocene: The Rise of the Correlational Machine // Chandler D., Fuchs C. (eds.) Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the Age of Big Data. London: University of Westminster Press, 2019. P. 23-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.b
