Political uncertainty of the nation as an objective factor in shaping the life plans of the Kurdish youth (empirical research experience)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2020-4-334-345Keywords:
national self-determination, territorial integrity, international law, life plans, conditions of political uncertainty, humanizationAbstract
The article presents both legal and sociological views on the problems of Nations living in the conditions of another state. The article examines the impact of the contradiction between the right of a nation to self-determination and the principle of territorial integrity as an urgent problem for the Kurdish youth. Attention is drawn to the need to humanize international law in relation to Nations in conditions of political uncertainty. It is proposed to use the following means to reduce violence: international law, international supranational organizations, and General humanization of social processes. To ensure that this contradiction does not remain practically insoluble and to reduce the level of violence in existing conflicts, it is necessary to develop certain international rules that would allow Nations fighting for sovereignty to exercise their right to self-determination. Based on the results of a sociological study of the life plans of Kurdish youth living in the Republic of Iraq, it is shown how such an objective factor as political uncertainty affects the formation of life plans of young people and what consequences this leads to. It is proved that the situation of the Kurdish people is not only a political, but also a social problem. A low horizon for planning a life strategy deprives the young generation of the opportunity to be confident in the future, hinders the creation of a family, and forms migration moods. For a person, the inability to plan their life turns into a state of frustration, depressive States, and the need to find a way out of this situation. The need to humanize the processes of self-determination of Nations is caused by the fact that life in a state of uncertainty has a negative impact on the ethnic group as a whole, and on young generations in particular.References
Народы и религии мира. М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1998. 928 с. URL: http://iea-ras.ru/index.php?go=Files&in=view&id=178 (дата обращения: 02.10.2020).
Бьюкенен А. Сецессия. Право на отделение, права человека и территориальная целостность государства. М.: Рудомино, 2001. 239 с.
Хабриева Т. Я. Самоопределение народов в современном мире: конституционно- и международно-правовые аспекты. М., 2011. 260 с.
Гоголев П. В. Национально-культурная автономия как форма этнокультурного самоопределения коренных малочисленных народов севера // Вестник СВФУ. 2015. Т. 12. № 1. С. 112-116.
Рубина Л. Я. Советское студенчество. М.: Мысль, 1981. 207 с.
Растова Л. М. Жизненные планы: общий анализ проблемы // Выбор судьбы. Социальные проблемы жизненного самоопределения молодежи Алтая. Барнаул: Алт. кн. изд-во, 1989. С. 62.
Рыжикова Л. В. Роль учителя в формировании жизненных планов выпускников школ // Модернизация профессионально-педагогического образования: тенденции, стратегия, зарубежный опыт: материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Барнаул, 2014. С. 307.
Шилова Н. А. Жизненные стратегии молодежи как предмет социально-гуманитарного знания // Известия Южного федерального университета. Педагогические науки. 2014. № 7. С. 108-114.
Чалбаева Е. В. Право этноса и нации на самоопределение: теоретико-методологические проблемы // Человеческий капитал. 2013. № 1 (49). С. 95-100.
Сампиев И. М. Самоопределение народов: теория и онтология. Ростов н/Д: Изд-во СКНЦ ВШ, 2004. 151 c.
