Algocracy in the Political System: Pro & Contra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2022-2-138-145Keywords:
algocracy, algorithmic management, big Data, machine learning, public administration, neural networks, artificial intelligenceAbstract
The development of information and communication technologies leads to new technological phenomena, such as artificial intelligence, which makes it possible to increase the capacity of the human brain to process information and make decisions. Over the last twenty years, the information collection system has become more complex, its volume is growing exponentially, and new ways of processing information, such as neural networks and machine learning, are appearing. Technologies are rapidly changing and developing, and of course the public administration system takes them to improve the accuracy of forecasts and the quality of decision-making in various policy sectors. Algorithmic governance is referred to by the term algocracy. However, not all of the public administration system works with the use of machine learning algorithms remain areas where traditional decision-making methods persist. Despite the progressiveness of algorithmic governance there are still a number of problematic aspects that require ethical and legislative regulation of algorithmic governance. The purpose of this article is to analyze the essence of governance based on the use of big data algorithms and to present a classification of the advantages and risks of an automated data analysis system for public administration.References
Aneesh A. Virtual migration: the programming of globalization. Durham, NC: Duke university press books, 2006. 208 p.
Domingos P. The master algorithm: how the quest for ultimate machine learning will remake our world. New York, NY: Basic books, 2015. 354 p.
Eun-Sung K. Deep learning and principal-agent problems of algorithmic governance: the new materialism perspective // Technology in Society. 2020. Vol. 63. Р. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101378
Ferguson A. The rise of big data policing: surveillance, race and future law. New York, NY: NYU Press, 2017. 272 p.
Konig P., Wenzelberg G. The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: why it arises and how to address it // Technology in Society. 2021. Vol. 67. Р. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101688
Mayer-Sohonberger V., Cukier K. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. London: John Murray, 2013. 256 p.
Danaher J. Freedom in an Age of Algocracy // Oxford Handbook on the Philosophy of Technology / Ed. by Sh. Vallor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Р. 1-32. URL: https://philarchive.org/archive/DANFIA (дата обращения: 23.12.2021).
Zarsky Tal. Automated predictions: perception, law and policy // Communications of the ACM. 2012. Vol. 15. № 9. P. 33-35.
Aneesh A. Global Labor: Algocratic Modes of Organization // Sociological Theory. 2009. Vol. 27. № 4. P. 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x
Gal M. Algorithmic Challenges to Autonomous Choice // Michigan Journal of Law and Technology. 2018. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 59-104.
Algorithmic governance: Developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence /j. Danaher [и др.] // Big Data & Society. 2017. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554.
Шваб К. Четвертая промышленная революция. М.: Эксмо, 2017. 288 с.
Natarajan P., Frenzel J. and Smaltz D. Demystifying Big Data and Machine Learning for Healthcare. London: Taylor&Frances, 2017. 210 p.
Панищев А. Л. Будущее государства как формы и способа бытия человека: перспективы и противоречия // Государство и право. 2021. № 12. С. 61-66.
Directive 95/46/EC ‘ICT and communication'. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/standards/ict-and-communication/data/directive-9546ec_en.html
Lyon D. and Wood D. M. Big Data Surveillance and Security Intelligence: Canadian Case. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2020. 289 p.
Stahl B. C. Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: an Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2021. 136 p.
Baer T. Understand, Manage and Prevent Algorithmic Bias: a Guide for Business Users and Data Scientists. New York: Apress, 2019. 258 p.
Barry L. The rationality of the digital governmentality // Journal for Cultural Research. 2020. № 4. P. 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2020.1714878.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. 538 p.
