Modern sociological approaches to innovation research (critical review)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2023-4-394-405Keywords:
innovation, innovation ecosystem, regional innovation ecosystem, sociological research of innovation, ecosystem of open innovation, current theoryAbstract
This article examines sociological research of innovations and prospects for considering innovations in a joint sociological. The article analyzes complex innovations, with a large number of various amenities available for distribution and territorial entities. Based on the analyses of current writers on the traces of innovations in the articles, it will be concluded that the agreed will weigh on innovation and will mean in the story and the saying of the Ecos in which innovations are generated and in the framework where the exploration of assets is carried out intrigued in the coordination of the process of economic development of a particular territory. Based on an extensive range of information, the authors inform the priority schemes for the development of both innovations and innovative ecosystems. Paying attention to the prospects for the practical implementation of innovative systems. Different attention in the work is dominated by an active - network approach to the search for innovations, which allows us to consider the prospects for the development of their innovations. Also, the article sends out research, agreed prospects for the use and examples of new technologies and their differentiation in specific cases, and it is possible to conclude about the implementation of communication and prospects for interaction within the innovation system for the implementation of reengineering of innovation.References
Андреев А. Л. Перспектива инновационного развития глазами российской научно-технической элиты // Мониторинг общественного мнения. 2011. № 2. С. 24-37.
Ушкин С. Г. Рутинизация информационных технологий как фактор формирования культуры инновационного мышления // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2014. № 2. С. 79-86.
Вольчик В. В. Дискурсы о социальных барьерах российской (контр) инновационной системы: реальность или нарратив // Социологические исследования. 2021. Т. 10. № 10. С. 61-71. DOI 10.31857/S013216250016089-0
Осипова О. Ю. Профессиональные компетенции, ценности, социальный статус молодых ученых региона // Регионология. 2011. № 2. С. 140-146.
Applying mixed methods sequential explanatory design to innovation management / W. Wipulanusat et al. // The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management. Springer Singapore, 2020. P. 485-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1910-9_40
Innovative activities and socio-psychological security in professional and personal development / Е. А. Shmeleva et al. // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2017. Vol. 26. С. 921-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.07.02.119
Шнейдер Л. Б. Образовательные инновации: позитивное и негативное // Вестник по педагогике и психологии Южной Сибири. 2014. № 2. С. 6-18.
Долженко Р. А. Предпосылки и последствия изменения содержания и характера труда в условиях становления инновационной экономики // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика. 2016. № 3 (35). С. 77-88. DOI 10.17223/19988648/35/7
Todt G., Weiss M., Hoegl M. Mitigating negative side effects of innovation project terminations: The role of resilience and social support // Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2018. Vol. 35. No. 4. P. 518-542. DOI 10.1111/jpim.12426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12426
Maher L., Plsek P., Bevan H. Creating the culture for innovation: a practical guide for leaders. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. Coventry, 2009. 50 p.
How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review / М. Tian et al. // Management Decision. 2018. Vol. 56, No. 5. P. 1088-1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0462
Juille T., Jullien D. Narrativity and identity in the representation of the economic agent // Journal of Economic Methodology. 2017. Vol. 24, No. 3. P. 274-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2017.1286027
Chen G., Liu C., Tjosvold D. Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China // Journal of Management Studies. 2005. Vol. 42, No. 2. P. 277-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00497.x
Christmann G. B.Introduction: Struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning // European Planning Studies. 2020. Vol. 28, No. 3. P. 423-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396
Killick A. Not ‘my economy': A political ethnographic study of interest in the economy // The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2022. Vol. 24, No. 1. P. 171-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211007064
Кантемирова Г. А. Возможности диффузии инноваций в системе социальных служб // Инструменты и механизмы формирования конкурентоспособности экономических систем: сборник статей по итогам Международной научно-практической конференции (Иркутск, 26 сентября 2019 г.). Стерлитамак: АМИ, 2019. С. 43-46.
Gault F., von Hippel E. A. The prevalence of user innovation and free innovation transfers: Implications for statistical indicators and innovation policy // MIT Sloan Research Paper. № 4722-09. P. 2-29.
de Jong J. P. J. The empirical scope of user innovation // Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, communities, and open innovation. London: The MIT Press Cambridge. 2016. P. 67-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9439.003.0007
Довбыш В. О. Сущность, подходы к определению понятия и способы классификации "инноваций" // Известия высших учебных заведений. Социология. Экономика. Политика. 2019. № 3. С. 9-19.
Яголковский С. Р. Психология инноваций. Подходы, модели, процессы. М.: Издательский дом Высшей школы экономики, 2011. 171 с.
Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking /j. Swan, S. Newell, H. Scarbrough, D. Hislop // Journal of Knowledge Management. 1999. Vol. 3, No. 4. Р. 262-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673279910304014
Гаазе-Рапопорт М. Г. Первый неформальный этап развития отечественной кибернетики // Философские исследования. 1993. № 4. С. 439-450.
Brozen Y. Invention, innovation, and imitation //The American Economic Review. 1951. Vol. 41, No. 2. P. 239-257.
Акбердина В. В., Василенко Е. В. Инновационная экосистема: теоретический обзор предметной области // Журнал экономической теории. 2021. Т. 18, № 3. С. 462-473. DOI 10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-3.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2021.18-3.10
Öberg C., Alexander A. T. The openness of open innovation in ecosystems-Integrating innovation and management literature on knowledge linkages // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2019. Vol. 4, No. 4. P. 211-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.10.005
Bacon E., Williams M. D., Davies G. H. Recipes for success: Conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystems // International Journal of Information Management. 2019. Vol. 49. P. 377-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.012
Pellikka J., Ali-Vehmas T. Managing innovation ecosystems to create and capture value in ICT industries // Technology Innovation Management Review. 2016. Vol. 6, No. 10. Р. 17-24. DOI 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1024
Helfat C. E., Raubitschek R. S. Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems // Research policy. 2018. Vol. 47, No. 8. P. 1391-1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019
Konietzko J., Bocken N., Hultink E. J. Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 253. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652619348127 (дата обращения: 01.08.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942
Ritala P., Almpanopoulou A. In defense of ‘eco' in innovation ecosystem // Technovation. 2017. Vol. 60. P. 39-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.01.004
Adner R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem // Harvard business review. 2006. Vol. 84, No. 4. P. 98.
Iansiti M., Levien R. Strategy as ecology // Harvard Business Review. 2004. Vol. 82, No. 3. P. 68-78, 126.
A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation / В. Walrave et al. // Technological forecasting and social change. 2018. Vol. 136. P. 103-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011
Mercan B., Goktas D.Components of innovation ecosystems: a cross-country study // International research journal of finance and economics. 2011. Vol. 76, No. 16. P. 102-112.
Moore J. F. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition // Harvard business review. 1993. Vol. 71, No. 3. P. 75-86.
Radziwon A., Bogers M. Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 146. P. 573-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
Li Y. R. The technological roadmap of Cisco's business ecosystem // Technovation. 2009. Vol. 29, No. 5. P. 379-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.01.007
Дрогобыцкий И. Н., Широков С. С. Экспертно-диагностическая система для анализа предкризисного состояния предприятий металлургического комплекса с использованием растущих пирамидальных сетей // Прикладная информатика. 2019. Т. 14, № 3 (81). С. 19-30.
Герасимов К. Б. Предпосылки использования акторно-сетевой теории для изучения цифровых инноваций // Современный менеджмент: проблемы и перспективы: Сборник статей по итогам XVI международной научно-практической конференции "Современный менеджмент: проблемы и перспективы". СПб.: Изд-во СПбГЭУ, 2021. С. 309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24108/preprints-3112323
Miettinen R. The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations // Mind, Culture, and Activity. 1999. Vol. 6, No. 3. P. 170-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524725
Litvin T. A. The actor-network theory of b. Latur and porcelain services of classicism: the relevance of a museological discussion // The Issues of Museology. 2019. Vol. 10, No. 1. С. 4-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu27.2019.101
Cochoy F., Mallard A. Another consumer culture Theory. An ANT look at consumption, or how "Market-things" help "cultivate" consumers // The Sage handbook of consumer culture. 2018. P. 384-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473998803.n22
Harrisson D., Laberge M. Innovation, identities and resistance: The social construction of an innovation network // Journal of Management Studies. 2002. Vol. 39, No. 4. P. 497-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00301
Mirbargkar S. M., Ebrahimi P., Soleimani M. ANT and mobile network service adoption in banking industry // Contemporary Applications of Actor Network Theory. 2020. P. 155-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7066-7_9
Corpataux J., Crevoisier O. Lost in space: A critical approach to ANT and the social studies of finance // Progress in Human Geography. 2016. Vol. 40, No. 5. P. 610-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515604430
Eisenreich A., Füller J., Stuchtey M. Open circular innovation: How companies can develop circular innovations in collaboration with stakeholders // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13, No. 23. P. 13456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313456
Predicting mobile wallet resistance: A two-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach / L. Y. Leong et al. // International Journal of Information Management. 2020. Vol. 51. P. 102047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102047
Кастельс М. Галактика Интернет: Размышления об Интернете, бизнесе и обществе / Пер. с англ. А. Матвеева; под ред. В. Харитонова. Екатеринбург: У-Фактория (при участии изд-ва Гуманитарного ун-та), 2004. 328 с.
Погодаева Т. В., Жапарова Д. В. Влияние инноваций на социально-экономическое развитие территорий: проблемы регионов интенсивного природопользования // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2015. № 7 (382). С. 16-27.
Crescenzi R., Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: the territorial dimension // Economic geography. 2017. Vol. 93, No. 1. P. 66-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532
Innovative territorial clusters / Y. B. Mindlin et al. // International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2016. Vol. 6, No. 8. P. 251-256.
Улезько А. В., Реймер В. В. Условия формирования инновационной модели развития социально-экономических систем // Вестник Воронежского государственного аграрного университета. 2015. № 2. С. 84-91.
Alla N., Dmitry M., Valery N. Creating conditions for successful development of innovation projects // 4th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2018). Atlantis Press, 2018. P. 218-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/emle-18.2018.37
Венчурный акселератор. URL: https://1va.vc/chelny/?ysclid=lmtc0ebofx728633676 (дата обращения: 12.08.2023).
