Political succession as a temporal aporia of digital communications

Authors

  • Konstantin F. Zavershinskiy St Petersburg University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2025-3-214-223

Keywords:

digitalization process, traditionalization, political continuity, political memory, politics of time, temporal regime of memory, temporal crisis

Abstract

This article explores how various methods of conceptualizing digitalization influence the interpretation of the relationship between digitalization and the dynamics of political continuity. Theoretical and methodological priorities in examining the nature and role of digitalization within political communications significantly affect how its possibilities and risks for maintaining political continuity are understood. Emphasis is placed on overcoming methodological scientistic reductionism in the analysis of digitalization processes. The importance of investigating the political and cultural specifics of the symbolic structures of political memory and their temporal regime is highlighted when assessing digitalization’s influence on contemporary political communications. In discussing both the constructive and destructive aspects of digitalization’s impact on the political traditions of a specific temporal regime, it is crucial to consider parameters such as repeatability, articulation, and controllability. It is asserted that digital communications act as triggers for the crisis of neoliberal forms of political communication and practices aimed at nurturing political traditions. Temporal regimes in political communications predetermine tendencies toward the homogenization of temporal representations within communities, which contributes to the creation of more stable conditions for the integration of representations of the past, present, and future. Traditionalization (continuity) plays a crucial role in the institutionalization and maintenance of models of political solidarity, serving as a major cultural resource for the temporary structuring of the political sphere, counteracting political inversion and arbitrariness in the actions of political actors. The need to address methodological aporias found in modernist and postmodernist research strategies related to communication processes based on principles of contemporary cultural sociology is also emphasized.

Author Biography

  • Konstantin F. Zavershinskiy, St Petersburg University
    D. Sc. (Politics)

References

Авдонин В. С., Силаева В. Л. Нейросети нового поколения в контексте технологий искусственного интеллекта, философии и социально-политических наук // Политическая наука. 2023. № 4. С. 127-154. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2023.04.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.04.05

Моделирование формирования общественного восприятия и политического доверия в условиях обязательности: кейс цифровых государственных услуг / А. С. Ахременко, И. Б. Филиппов, В. В. Сычев, В. Ю. Егоров // Политическая наука. 2025. № 1. С. 77-102. DOI 10.31249/poln/2025.01.03

The future of digital communication: the metaverse / Еdited by Raquel V. Benitez Boca Raton. L., NY: CRC Press, 2024. 178 p.

Bauman Z. Retrotopia. Cambridg: Polity Press, 2017. 180 p. DOI 10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.22

Olick J. K. The Sins of the Fathers: Germany, Memory, Method. University of Chicago Press, 2016. 496 p. DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226386522.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226386522.001.0001

Torres F. Temporal regimes: materiality, politics, technology. New York: Routledge, 2022. 186 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003180876

Osborne P. The politics of time // Radical Philosophy. 1994. Issue: RP 068. (Autumn). Р. 3-9.

Osborne P. The politics of time: modernity and avant-garde. London: Verso Books, 1995. 272 p.

Hobsbawm E.Introduction: Inventing Tradition // The Invention of Tradition. E. Hobsbawm & R. Terrence (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2012. P.1-14. DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107295636.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636.001

Beckeld B. Western Self-Contempt: Oikophobia in the Decline of Civilizations. Ithaca and London: Northern Illinois University Press, 2022. 288 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501763182.001.0001

Coeckelbergh M. Digital Technologies, Temporality, and the Politics of Co-Existence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Natur, 2023. 95 p. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-17982-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17982-2

Galtung J. Transcend and transform: an introduction to conflict work. L.: Pluto Press, 2004. 200 p.

Buccitelli A. B. Race and ethnicity in digital culture: our changing traditions, impressions, and expressions in a mediated world. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, LLC, 2018. 416 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216003953

Assmann A., Assmann J. Gemeinsinn: Der sechste, soziale Sinn. München: C. H. Beck, 2024. 262 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406821875

Метамодернизм. Историчность, Аффект и Глубина после постмодернизма. М.: РИПОЛ-классик, 2020. 342 с.

Metamodernism: the future of theory / Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2021. 360 p.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

Issue

Section

Political Science